Could A Profound Love, Sad but Meaningful ---
--- be a better choice than one that's cheery, impeccable but meaningless?
Would a love that's always changing, fluidly dependent on mood, and always moving, be better than one that's stable and sustaining?
Should I fall for one that promises a better future, places all around the world, and happy, normal family life than one that's truer than true and promises nothing but romance and forever?
Is it a better choice to settle with one who elicits strong emotions especially with music and romantic movie scenes than one that exists but that is?
One is sad but meaningful and the other is happy but meaningless. Empty but happy. Sad but true. A world all around the world. A world inspired by emotions and creates a world of its own with poems and music. Happy but uninspiring. Sad but profound.
A happy life. A romantic life.
Whom would I choose?
I would choose a love that seems inconspicuous but is real deep within. Something that's not defined by beauty standards created by the world, but one that was chosen out of personality.
A love that is happy. A love that is stable. A love that's sustaining.
If it sometimes feels meaningless, it's because we never, ever fight. If it sometimes feels empty, it's because we're always happy.
Every moment, every single second that I'm with you.
I would compare you to all the girls that I've dated every now and then, but I always end up choosing you.
My love for you does not depend on music or romantic movie scene. My love for you depends on you, and you alone.
Ever since I told myself to choose someone because of personality, I've met you.
Although it happened so fast - almost like a whirlwind - I know that you're "the one" fifteen minutes into meeting you for the first time.
You are not perfect, but I love you.
Please don't watch on your body too much. All I really needed is someone I can hug and hold hands with comfortably.
I love you from the bottom of my heart.
I choose you...